I’m trying to learn for my English class and I’m stuck. Can you help?

Gerstel and Sarkisian Discussion Essay

Writing a discussion essay on the works of Gerstel and Sarkisian involves critically analyzing their research, theories, and findings related to a specific topic. Here’s a step-by-step guide to help you structure your essay:

1. Choose a Topic: Select a specific topic or research question that both Gerstel and Sarkisian have explored in their works. Ensure that there are significant points of similarity or contrast between their approaches to make for a fruitful discussion.(Gerstel and Sarkisian Discussion Essay)
2. Introduction: a. Provide a brief overview of the topic and its significance. b. Introduce Gerstel and Sarkisian as researchers and their respective works. c. Present your thesis statement that outlines the main points of comparison or contrast in their research.(Gerstel and Sarkisian Discussion Essay)
3. Literature Review: a. Summarize the key findings and arguments of Gerstel’s work on the chosen topic. b. Summarize the key findings and arguments of Sarkisian’s work on the chosen topic. c. Identify any shared themes or divergent perspectives that emerge from their research.
4. Comparative Analysis: a. Compare the methodologies used by Gerstel and Sarkisian in their studies. b. Analyze the strengths and weaknesses of their approaches in addressing the research question. c. Discuss how their different methodologies might have influenced their findings.
5. Discussion of Findings: a. Present the main findings of Gerstel’s research and their implications. b. Present the main findings of Sarkisian’s research and their implications. c. Compare and contrast the findings of both researchers, highlighting similarities and differences.(Gerstel and Sarkisian Discussion Essay)
6. Theoretical Framework: a. Examine the theoretical frameworks or concepts that underpin Gerstel’s research. b. Examine the theoretical frameworks or concepts that underpin Sarkisian’s research. c. Analyze how their theoretical perspectives may have shaped their research outcomes.(Gerstel and Sarkisian Discussion Essay)
7. Critique: a. Critically evaluate the strengths and limitations of both researchers’ studies. b. Consider the validity and reliability of their findings and methodologies. c. Discuss any potential biases or limitations in their research designs.(Gerstel and Sarkisian Discussion Essay)
8. Conclusion: a. Summarize the main points of comparison and contrast between Gerstel and Sarkisian’s research. b. Offer your final judgment on whose research you find more convincing or effective (if appropriate) and justify your stance. c. Highlight any gaps in the existing research that remain unaddressed and suggest possible avenues for future research.(Gerstel and Sarkisian Discussion Essay)
9. References: Cite all the sources used in your essay, including the works of Gerstel and Sarkisian, in the appropriate citation style (APA, MLA, etc.).

Remember to maintain an objective and evidence-based tone throughout the essay. Support your claims with examples and evidence from their works and other relevant scholarly sources. Good luck with your discussion essay!(Gerstel and Sarkisian Discussion Essay)

Instructions:

Gerstel and Sarkisian point out that a commonly held perception among social commentators and politicians is that “Black and Latino/a, especially Puerto Rican, families are more disorganized than White families” (45). In light of this claim, review the selections listed below.

“An Indian Story” by Roger Jack
“Aunt Ida Pieces a Quilt” by Melvin Dixon
“Looking for Work” by Gary Soto

Choose one family and explain to what extent that family can be described as “disorganized” (that is–marked by ineffectual and unsupportive relationships or poor family ties) or instead, discuss to what extent it exhibits “extended family solidarities and caretaking activities” (45). You must cite (directly quote) at least one passage from the selection you choose from the list above for full credit AND you must cite once from Gerstel and Sarkisian’s essay. For full credit, you must also cite your passages according to MLA style guidelines.(Gerstel and Sarkisian Discussion Essay)

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1k9agfexUlamznzIc7nESxFQhd2Dc9Tvx-TdF6HlT8gU/edit?usp=sharing

An Indian story: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Up7UFKmIdJOlg4…

Your post must be a well developed paragraph made up of at least 10 sentences of your own writing. Here’s a model of a well developed paragraph for a Discussion Post:

Gerstel and Sarkisian Discussion Essay

AN EXEMPLARY POST

Hello Everyone,

In “C.P Ellis” by Studs Terkel, we are given the personal story of a former racist. In this essay, Ellis describes his racist attitudes going back to his youth. Many of his attitudes can be explained using the ideas presented in the “Causes of Prejudice” by Vincent Parillo. Indeed, the theory of prejudice that best explains Ellis’s racism is the one about frustration. Parillo describes frustration as “the result of relative deprivation in which expectations remain unsatisfied. Relative Deprivation is a lack of resources, or rewards, in one’s standard of living in comparison with those of others in the society” (391). In other words, poverty can generate racism. We see this idea illustrated in Ellis’s life(Gerstel and Sarkisian Discussion Essay). Ellis worked hard and struggled to support his family but could not overcome his financial problems.(An Indian-Story DiscussionPost-Essay) Eventually he got upset and wanted someone to blame. Ellis states “I really began to get bitter. I didn’t know who to blame. I tried to find somebody. I began to blame it on the black people. I hate to blame somebody” (400). Evidently, Ellis found someone to blame all the problems that he had in life. Black people were his scapegoat because he blamed them for something that was not his fault. His father was in the Klu Klux Klan so Ellis decided to use black people just like his father. Later, he also joined the KKK so he could be a part of something and eventually became president.(Gerstel and Sarkisian Discussion Essay)