Characteristics of the Citizen Action Committee (Needs Statement and Management Plan)
The citizen action committee is made up of community members. It mobilizes people to advocate for matters of public interest. The committee utilizes in-person, phone, and people’s online engagement to advocate for public health, enhance environmental quality, and other issues that benefit the public. The main goal is to connect the people, protect democracy, and establish sustainability (Needs Statement and Management Plan).
The community works by sending its professional organizers to the community who encourage people to protect their health, rights, and interests, eliminating any government and corporate power abuses. The committee succeeds in the strength-in-numbers strategy, emphasizing consumer political power on the problems affecting them.
It researches and analyzes complex issues, and how they affect people, motivating individuals to help. Its field and phone canvassers maintain close contact with the people, offering new opportunities to make a difference and providing information on digital activism resources and opportunities (Needs Statement and Management Plan).
Major campaigns in the last decades include the ‘good neighbors’ campaign for pollution prevention, the campaign against coal boilers and preventing pollution from new coal plants and garbage incinerators, advocating for clean and renewable energy, and moving standard changes on efficiency and renewable energy. By working together, the committee amplifies individual power to impact decisions and policymaking.
There are multiple sources to contact for grant funding opportunities. Many government agencies and departments, corporations, and non-profit organizations have shown interest in public health issues, especially pollution control and prevention. US government funding opportunities include grants from the Environmental Protection Agency and National Institutes of Health. In addition, National Science Foundation, United States Agency for International Development, and Health Resources & Services Administration (US Funding Sources, n.d.).
These government agencies provide open opportunities to apply for grants. They have a high interest in public health and are always willing to engage in any movement to protect the public interest and build healthy and sustainable communities. There are also some funding opportunities from organizations that support research activities such as the American Cancer Society, Brain & Behavior Research Foundation, International Literacy Association, The Josiah Macy Jr (Needs Statement and Management Plan).
Foundation, March of Dimes, The Spencer Foundation, and the Thrasher Fund (ASHA, n.d.). Most of these organizations support research on pollution’s impacts on people’s health. Research work offers concrete evidence on pollution consequences, encouraging community members to help and advocate for matters of interest to them (Needs Statement and Management Plan).
The grant team can also contact organizations that provide news and information on philanthropic opportunities, such as the Chronicle of Philanthropy, Council on Foundations, Foundation Center, National Center of Charitable Statistics, and Inside Philanthropy. The Citizen Action Committee depends heavily on philanthropists (Needs Statement and Management Plan).
The project aims at powering a clean future in the community by advocating for pollution control and prevention. The goal is to help communities decide what is best for themselves. Many states have passed clean and renewable energy bills and promised to reduce carbon emissions. However, some of the laws have not been enforceable, considering that some states in Midwestern regions of The US, such as Ohio, still depend on coal (Needs Statement and Management Plan).
The program aims to enhance public health quality through localized community-driven change. The citizen action committee will take steps towards green and sustainable energy and push 100% renewable energy in different states by 2050. Carbon emissions affect community health, and different states have declared climate emergencies (Rousse, 2008).
The program also advocates for rural communities to incorporate renewable energy into their daily lives. This move includes establishing wind farms. The advocacy also details the economic benefits of investing in renewable energy. The program seeks to ensure that renewables outpace natural gas consumption (Needs Statement and Management Plan).
Transitioning to renewable energy would reduce carbon emissions substantially. The program’s primary purpose is to create green homes and improve people’s health. The action committee also seeks to develop local energy efficiency programs and interventions to enhance household energy bills’ affordability and programs that encourage infrastructure improvement to support electrified fleets, reducing about 30% of carbon emissions (Needs Statement and Management Plan).
The program increases the understanding that failing to reduce carbon emissions will worsen climate change, especially in Midwestern regions. The changing weather will hurt the economy if appropriate measures are not adopted (Yi, 2015). The project also seeks to invest in research concerning climate change and effective interventions to reduce its effects. There are many ways to curb carbon emissions, but the most crucial step is to invite community members to commit.
The management plan incorporates staffing needs, roles, and responsibilities. The grant director is responsible for developing and analyzing recommendations, providing general directives, and ensuring regulations adherence. The project director is also responsible for conducting management oversight. The director should ensure that the project meets all the grant-funded conditions (Needs Statement and Management Plan).
The director will also arrange and attend meetings with financiers and the project’s community partners. Other roles include contract management and analysis of procurement policy, monitoring and evaluating compliance information and researching and identifying grant opportunities (Browning, n.d.). The director is also expected to prepare the project reports, a requirement by partners, investors, and legislators.
Other personnel are responsible for carrying out project functions daily. A principal investigator (PI) has management roles responsible for ensuring the project design’s integrity. The PI also undertakes oversight on compliance, financial, and partnership relations. Grant coordinators at departmental levels are also vital for the grant project implementation (Browning, n.d.).
The coordinator has specific responsibilities at the unit level, such as ensuring alignment with the project goals, analyzing financial and statistical data, conducting follow-ups, and going to administrative meetings concerning the grant project. A financial analyst would be responsible for conducting all finance-related activities such as budgeting and analyzing funding sources (Needs Statement and Management Plan).
The financial analysts also ensure that funds are allocated accordingly and prepare financial reporting. The HR professions would develop job descriptions and a staffing structure to support an effective grant management team. A grant writer specializes in proposals and reporting.
The grant management associate coordinates with personnel to execute the grant specifics and communicates daily with the financial analysts about the grant condition’s compliance. A grant management assistant would also be vital in supporting administrative functions, and guiding data entry, essential for grant processing (Marker, 2018). This team would be enough to ensure the grant project’s successful execution (Needs Statement and Management Plan).
American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (n.d.). Federal and Private Funding Sources for Researchers. Retrieved from https://www.asha.org/research/grants-funding/funding-for-researchers/
Browning, B. A. (n.d.). How to Profile Project Personnel for Your Grant Application. Retrieved from https://www.dummies.com/business/nonprofits/grants/how-to-profile-project-personnel-for-your-grant-application/
Marker, A. (2018). Keys to Succeeding in Grant Management. Retrieved from https://www.smartsheet.com/grant-management
Rousse, O. (2008). Environmental and economic benefits resulting from citizens’ participation in CO2 emissions trading: An efficient alternative solution to the voluntary compensation of CO2 emissions. Energy Policy, 36(1), 388-397.
US Funding Sources. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.peakproposals.com/us-funding-sources/
Yi, H. (2015). Clean-energy policies and electricity sector carbon emissions in the US states. Utilities Policy, 34, 19-29.