Immigration Policy Issue Article Review – Week 3 Solution

This article covers sample Immigration Policy Issue Article Review.

Instructions

This is an article review for a peer-reviewed journal article on an immigration policy issue. The article is uploaded in the order files. The review should be three (3) pages typed, double-spaced (about 750 words).

1. Clearly introduce the article\\’s title, author, and source information (i.e., journal name, publication date, volume, pages).

2. Introduce and discuss the article\\’s topic.

3. Summarize and discuss the major theory or theme(s) of the article as it relates to immigration policy.

4. Did the author conduct research? If so, what was the research question and methodology?

5. Discuss the author’s arguments/points of view.

6. What were the author’s Findings/conclusions/major issues?

7. What is the article’s implications for immigration policy?

8. Discuss what was learned from the article.

9. Critique the value of the information in the article in terms of how it can (or cannot) be applied to the field of immigration in homeland security.

10. Please do not quote extensively from the article. Your summary/critique should be an in-depth ‘review’, not a regurgitation of quotes.

11. This is not a mini-research paper, but rather a review of an article and how it relates to immigration policy.

12. Please include a “Reference” page that includes the APA-Style reference of the article being reviewed. Additional peer-reviewed references are not required for this assignment.

Solution

Immigration Policy Issue Article Review

Over the past decades, the adoption of immigration policies in different jurisdictions has shaped immigrants’ perceptions and attitudes. Depending on immigrants’ status, some jurisdictions enact laws to integrate them into society while others seek to expel undocumented persons.

The policies that support the integration of immigrations are referred to as proactive or pro-immigrant, while contrary ones are reactive or anti-immigrant policies. In the article “The New Immigration Contestation: Social Movements and Local Immigration Policy Making in the United States, 2000-2001,” Vasi and Steil (2014) examined the impact of the explanatory power of resource mobilization, political process, and strain theories of social movements on policy outcomes differ when assessing proactive as opposed to reactive movements.

Although there is extensive literature presents varying explanations for the rapidly increasing local immigration legislation, this study examines processes leading to the enactment of pro-immigrant policies along with those that lead to the adoption of anti-immigrant laws.

Steil and Vasi (2014) used a mixed-method approach to analyze 1,301 cities that constituted more than 25,000 people. They used Cox proportional hazards models to make estimates of dependent and independent variables. The authors employed event history analysis to determine national variations in specific cities using semi-structured interviews to compare processes that result in the adoption of proactive and reactive policies.

For the purpose of the research, the authors identified 96 cities that adopted anti-immigrant policies and 97 cities that adopted pro-immigrant policies. Researchers organized data for each city annually during the study. Locations for pro-immigrant and anti-immigrant groups were measured using information from various nationwide active organizations.

Although debates surrounding immigration issues center at federal levels, it has since transcended local and state levels, with a significant impact on various fronts. As a result, the term “new immigration contestation” denotes increasing local policy-making processes (Steil & Vasi, 2014).

The authors argue that an impending surge in local policy-making due to rising new forms of local associations would be reflect existing local chapters of organizations working on immigration issues. This analogy would mean that the local presence of pro-immigrant organizations results in the passage of pro-immigrant ordinances, as would be the case for anti-immigrant organizations and ordinances.

Are you looking for answers to a similar assignment?Nursingstudy.org has the top and most qualified writers to help with any of your assignments. All you need to do is place an order with us.(Immigration Policy Issue Article Review)

Immigration policy issue article review
Immigration Policy Issue Article Review

The passage of pro-immigrant ordinances is also associated with municipal political context favorable to pro-immigrant policies, as would be for anti-immigrant organizations and ordinances. However, results and findings affirm the factors that contribute support for proactive policies in favor of reactive policies.

The Steil and Vasi (2014) study builds on previous studies on immigration policy-making and social movement outcomes. It utilizes a unique research design to compare the impacts of proactive and reactive processes on local laws whose results are different.

Also, the study finds that framing of structural social underpinnings is vital as they determine how the changes influence policy outcomes. Another finding is evident by analyzing spatial consequences of movement protest; other unintended consequences are drawn into pro-immigrant mobilizations and primarily determined by people’s geographical alienations.

The study’s findings present implications for immigration and immigration policies. In the US, immigration policies are set to cater to the needs of immigrants, citizens, and political leaders (Steil & Vasi, 2014). However, ordinances such as the pro-immigrant ones were implemented because of the presence of sympathetic local political allies and immigrant community organizations.

Similarly, anti-immigrant ordinances were primarily influenced by structural changes in society due to local Latinos’ rising populations. Although previous research on the influence of organizations on adopting policies presents compelling evidence, the current study’s findings do not show any significant results on the adoption of anti-immigrant laws.

The Steil and Vasi (2014) study have several implications on the US immigration policy. It draws extensive support and unparalleled criticism from advocates, policymakers, service providers, and the research community on immigration policy provisions.

Despite anti-immigrant groups being perpetuated to resent undocumented immigrants in US neighborhoods, it is not conclusive to assert that immigrants associate themselves with violent crimes and neither do they threaten local livelihoods.

Nevertheless, reactive groups contend that many undocumented immigrants, especially Latinos, eliminate job opportunities and increase health and education expenditures. This study can present adverse effects for minority groups who can be forced to forego assistance in the form of basic needs and public services, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic.

The adoption of immigration policies depends on a country’s cultural and economic factors. Although this study presents substantive evidence regarding pro- and anti-immigrant policies, it does not explicitly expound on the association between local and national underpinnings.

Future research on immigration can focus on social concerns and measure actual local framing of structural changes in a national scope. As stated before, protests resulted in unintended consequences from other quarters, raising a concern pertinent to movement-countermovement dynamics’ spatiality.

Therefore, further research and analysis can center on this aspect in greater detail. I believe that the study impacts different factions of the US population thus set precedence for new research on immigration. Today, the input of state and localities to streamline immigration laws is significant and will impact future policies.

References

de Graauw, E., Gleeson, S., & Bloemraad, I. (2013). Funding immigrant organizations: Suburban free riding and local civic presence. American Journal of Sociology119(1), 75-130. doi.org/10.1086/671168

Steil, J., & Vasi, I. (2014). The new immigration contestation: Social movements and local immigration policy making in the United States, 2000–2011. American Journal of Sociology119(4), 1104-1155. doi.org/10.1086/675301

Health Care Systems Essay Examples

Growth of Hospitals and Health Care Systems with Benefits of Long-Term Care Facilities”Growth of Hospitals and Health Care Systems with Benefits of Long-Term Care Facilities”
Discuss how health care delivery systems work collaboratively to address global health concerns and some of the stakeholders that work on these issuesSelect a global health issue affecting the international health community. Briefly describe the global health issue and its impact on the larger public health care systems
Drivers Of High Performance Healthcare SystemsNR 506 Week 5: Drivers of High Performance Healthcare Systems Select two drivers (for example quality, cost, and access) of high performance healthcare systems and apply it to your current work situation. 
Ethics, Policy, And Health Care Delivery SystemsDescribe current federal health care policies and standards that are designed to offer guidance to health organizations to ensure quality of care among vulnerable populations
A Comparison of Healthcare SystemsComparison of Healthcare Systems in US

Read More:

Chapter 12 Summary: Concepts of Sex and Gender in Treatment of Infants and Children

Roles of Biostatisticians in Drug and Device Development Reflection 1 Solution

A Page will cost you $12, however, this varies with your deadline. 

Enjoy the convenience of having a reliable Writer to do your paper at an Affordable Price.  With our premium writing service, you no longer have to spend days and nights meticulously working on your assignment, instead use that time to do other important things. 

Upon completion, we will send the paper to you via email and in the format you prefer (word, pdf or ppt). 

Start by filling this short order form nursingstudy.org/order

And then follow the progressive flow. 

Having an issue, chat with customer support online

Regards,

Cathy, CS.