PLEASE USE FORMAT PROVIDED IN the “ADDITIONAL MATERIAL” box. The purpose of this assignment is to conduct a comparison on different research designs to better understand their designs and application. Understanding the different types of research design is important so that nurses can effectively apply evidence-based research into practice to address issues and offer better patient care.<\/p>\n
You will utilize your approved nursing practice problem to complete the evidence-based practice project proposal assignments for this course and NUR-590, during which you will synthesize all of the sections into a final written paper detailing your evidence-based practice project proposal.<\/p>\n
Review feedback from your instructor on your “Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal: Identification of Nursing Practice Problem,” submitted in Topic 1. If your original proposed nursing problem was outside the scope of nursing practice or not conducive to an evidence-based practice project proposal, work with your instructor to identify a new topic prior to beginning this assignment. If your proposed topic requires revision, complete this prior to beginning this assignment.<\/p>\n
Conduct a literature search on your approved nursing practice problem. Find two translational research articles, one quantitative article, and one qualitative article. Using the “Translational Research Graphic Organizer,” present your proposed topic and, in the tables provided, compare one translational study to the quantitative study, and one translational study to the qualitative study.<\/p>\n
Refer to the “Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal \u00e2\u20ac\u201c Assignment Overview” document for an overview of the evidence-based practice project proposal assignments.<\/p>\n
You are required to cite four peer-reviewed sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.<\/p>\n
While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.<\/p>\n
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.<\/p>\n
Collapse All<\/p>\n
Nursing Practice Problem (Revision)<\/p>\n
10 points<\/p>\n
Criteria Description<\/p>\n
Nursing Practice Problem (Revision)<\/p>\n
5. Excellent<\/p>\n
10 points<\/p>\n
NA<\/p>\n
4. Good<\/p>\n
9.2 points<\/p>\n
The nursing practice problem is clearly presented and approved. No revision was required, or all necessary revisions are were made.<\/p>\n
3. Satisfactory<\/p>\n
8.8 points<\/p>\n
Revisions were made accordingly to improve the proposed nursing practice problem, but some aspects are inaccurate or unclear. Additional revisions are still required for approval.<\/p>\n
2. Less Than Satisfactory<\/p>\n
8 points<\/p>\n
The changes failed to meet the criteria for a relevant nursing practice problem for an evidence-based practice project proposal. Additional revisions are still required for approval.<\/p>\n
1. Unsatisfactory<\/p>\n
0 points<\/p>\n
The nursing practice problem was not included, or the required revisions were not made.<\/p>\n
Translational and Traditional Articles<\/p>\n
15 points<\/p>\n
Criteria Description<\/p>\n
Translational and Traditional Articles<\/p>\n
5. Excellent<\/p>\n
15 points<\/p>\n
One article does not meet the assignment criteria. Overall, the articles generally support the proposed nursing practice problem. The proposed problem would be better supported with the selection of one or two different articles.<\/p>\n
4. Good<\/p>\n
13.8 points<\/p>\n
A quantitative article and a qualitative article were each compared to a translational research article. The articles are peer-reviewed, published within the last five years, and pertain to the nursing practice problem. The assignment criteria are fully met.<\/p>\n
3. Satisfactory<\/p>\n
13.2 points<\/p>\n
The articles meet the assignment criteria and provide adequate support for the proposed nursing practice problem.<\/p>\n
2. Less Than Satisfactory<\/p>\n
12 points<\/p>\n
Two articles do not meet the assignment criteria. It is unclear how one or two of the articles support the proposed nursing practice problem.<\/p>\n
1. Unsatisfactory<\/p>\n
0 points<\/p>\n
More than two articles selected do not meet the assignment criteria. At least one article is omitted.<\/p>\n
Comparison of Methodology Between Translational and Traditional Research<\/p>\n
15 points<\/p>\n
Criteria Description<\/p>\n
Comparison of Methodology Between Translational and Traditional Research<\/p>\n
5. Excellent<\/p>\n
15 points<\/p>\n
The comparison between translational and quantitative and translational and qualitative methodologies is thorough and accurate. A clear understanding of translational and traditional methodologies is demonstrated.<\/p>\n
4. Good<\/p>\n
13.8 points<\/p>\n
The comparison between translational and quantitative and translational and qualitative methodologies is adequately presented. Some aspects require more detail for accuracy or clarity.<\/p>\n
3. Satisfactory<\/p>\n
13.2 points<\/p>\n
A summary comparison between translational and quantitative and translational and qualitative methodologies is presented. Some aspects are incorrect or unclear.<\/p>\n
2. Less Than Satisfactory<\/p>\n
12 points<\/p>\n
The comparison between translational and quantitative and translational and qualitative methodologies is incomplete. There are significant inaccuracies.<\/p>\n
1. Unsatisfactory<\/p>\n
0 points<\/p>\n
The comparison between translational and quantitative and translational and qualitative methodologies is omitted.<\/p>\n
Comparison of Goals Between Translational and Traditional Research<\/p>\n
15 points<\/p>\n
Criteria Description<\/p>\n
Comparison of Goals Between Translational and Traditional Research<\/p>\n
5. Excellent<\/p>\n
15 points<\/p>\n
The comparison of goals between translational and quantitative and translational and qualitative research is thorough and accurate. An understanding of goals between traditional and translational research is evident.<\/p>\n
4. Good<\/p>\n
13.8 points<\/p>\n
A comparison of goals between translational and quantitative and translational and qualitative research is adequately presented. Some aspects require more detail for accuracy or clarity.<\/p>\n
3. Satisfactory<\/p>\n
13.2 points<\/p>\n
The comparison of goals between translational and quantitative and translational and qualitative research is incomplete. There are significant inaccuracies.<\/p>\n
2. Less Than Satisfactory<\/p>\n
12 points<\/p>\n
A summary comparison of goals between translational and quantitative and translational and qualitative research is presented. Some aspects are incorrect or unclear.<\/p>\n
1. Unsatisfactory<\/p>\n
0 points<\/p>\n
The comparison of goals between translational and quantitative and translational and qualitative research is omitted.<\/p>\n
Comparison of Data Collection Between Translational and Traditional Research<\/p>\n
15 points<\/p>\n
Criteria Description<\/p>\n
Comparison of Data Collection Between Translational and Traditional Research<\/p>\n
5. Excellent<\/p>\n
15 points<\/p>\n
The comparison of data collection between translational and quantitative and translational and qualitative research is incomplete. There are significant inaccuracies.<\/p>\n
4. Good<\/p>\n
13.8 points<\/p>\n
The comparison of data collection between translational and quantitative and translational and qualitative research is thorough and accurate. An understanding of goals between traditional and translational research is evident.<\/p>\n
3. Satisfactory<\/p>\n
13.2 points<\/p>\n
The comparison of data collection between translational and quantitative and translational and qualitative research is adequately presented. Some aspects require more detail for accuracy or clarity.<\/p>\n
2. Less Than Satisfactory<\/p>\n
12 points<\/p>\n
A summary comparison of data collection between translational and quantitative and translational and qualitative research is presented. Some aspects are incorrect or unclear.<\/p>\n
1. Unsatisfactory<\/p>\n
0 points<\/p>\n
The comparison of data collection between translational and quantitative and translational and qualitative research is omitted.<\/p>\n
Observations (Similarities and Differences)<\/p>\n
20 points<\/p>\n
Criteria Description<\/p>\n
Observations (Similarities and Differences)<\/p>\n
5. Excellent<\/p>\n
20 points<\/p>\n
The similarities and differences between translational and quantitative and translational and qualitative research are presented. Some detail is needed for clarity or accuracy<\/p>\n
4. Good<\/p>\n
18.4 points<\/p>\n
The similarities and differences between translational and quantitative and translational and qualitative research are detailed and informative.<\/p>\n
3. Satisfactory<\/p>\n
17.6 points<\/p>\n
The similarities and differences between translational and quantitative and translational and qualitative research are summarized. More information is needed. There are minor inaccuracies.<\/p>\n
2. Less Than Satisfactory<\/p>\n
16 points<\/p>\n
The similarities and differences between translational and quantitative and translational and qualitative research are only partially discussed. The narrative is vague and contains inaccuracies.<\/p>\n
1. Unsatisfactory<\/p>\n
0 points<\/p>\n
The similarities and differences between translational and quantitative and translational and qualitative research are not discussed.<\/p>\n
Mechanics of Writing<\/p>\n
5 points<\/p>\n
Criteria Description<\/p>\n
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use)<\/p>\n
5. Excellent<\/p>\n
5 points<\/p>\n
The writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.<\/p>\n
4. Good<\/p>\n
4.6 points<\/p>\n
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.<\/p>\n
3. Satisfactory<\/p>\n
4.4 points<\/p>\n
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.<\/p>\n
2. Less Than Satisfactory<\/p>\n
4 points<\/p>\n
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.<\/p>\n
1. Unsatisfactory<\/p>\n
0 points<\/p>\n
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is employed<\/p>\n
Documentation of Source<\/p>\n
5 points<\/p>\n
Criteria Description<\/p>\n
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)<\/p>\n
5. Excellent<\/p>\n
5 points<\/p>\n
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.<\/p>\n
4. Good<\/p>\n
4.6 points<\/p>\n
Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.<\/p>\n
3. Satisfactory<\/p>\n
4.4 points<\/p>\n
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.<\/p>\n
2. Less Than Satisfactory<\/p>\n
4 points<\/p>\n
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.<\/p>\n
1. Unsatisfactory<\/p>\n
0 points<\/p>\n
Sources are not documented.<\/p>\n
Total 100 points<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
NOTE: my proposed problem paper is attached so you know what problem I am working on:<\/p>\n
Part 1: <\/strong>Propose a relevant nursing practice problem :<\/p>\n Obesity in children is a serious hazard to their health, and its prevalence is rising, placing children at risk of ill health. Childhood obesity can cause chronic weakness that lasts throughout adulthood. Weight in youth has an impact on more than just physical well-being. Children who are overweight or obese may become discouraged, and their mental self-esteem and confidence may suffer as a result.<\/p>\n Population<\/strong><\/p>\n children all ages 2-12 years<\/p>\n Intervention<\/strong><\/p>\n focus on technology use and diet<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Translational Research Graphic Organizer <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":0,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":"","_wpscppro_dont_share_socialmedia":false,"_wpscppro_custom_social_share_image":0,"_facebook_share_type":"","_twitter_share_type":"","_linkedin_share_type":"","_pinterest_share_type":"","_linkedin_share_type_page":"","_instagram_share_type":"","_medium_share_type":"","_threads_share_type":"","_google_business_share_type":"","_selected_social_profile":[],"_wpsp_enable_custom_social_template":false,"_wpsp_social_scheduling":{"enabled":false,"datetime":null,"platforms":[],"status":"template_only","dateOption":"today","timeOption":"now","customDays":"","customHours":"","customDate":"","customTime":"","schedulingType":"absolute"},"_wpsp_active_default_template":true},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-232818","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-nursing-paper"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/nursingstudy.org\/examples\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/232818","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/nursingstudy.org\/examples\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/nursingstudy.org\/examples\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nursingstudy.org\/examples\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=232818"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/nursingstudy.org\/examples\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/232818\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":277412,"href":"https:\/\/nursingstudy.org\/examples\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/232818\/revisions\/277412"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/nursingstudy.org\/examples\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=232818"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nursingstudy.org\/examples\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=232818"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nursingstudy.org\/examples\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=232818"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}