Bob Intelligence Assessment Report-Nursing Paper Examples

Strengths and Weaknesses

The Wechsler Abbreviated Scales of Intelligence (WASI) scale is used to measure verbal, non-verbal, and cognitive abilities among individuals (Wright & Raiford, 2021). Test scores between 90-109 on the scale are considered average. In this case, Bob produced average scores in FSIQ-4 (94), indicating a strong understanding of vocabulary, similarities, and matrix reasoning (Bob Intelligence Assessment Report).

Besides, he displayed average intelligence skills in verbal comprehension (99) and perpetual reasoning (91), indicating no challenges in engaging with his peers. However, Bob’s weaknesses were evident in his visual-spatial skills. Consequently, the Wide Range Achievement Test-Revision 4 (WRAT-4) scale was also used in measuring Bob’s reading, sentence comprehension, math computation, and reading composite (Neukrug. & Fawcett, 2019). Scores between 90-110 are considered average. Bob displayed average intelligence skills in word reading (99), sentence comprehension (93), and reading composite (95) in this case. He has weaknesses in math computation (83) and spelling (78) (Bob Intelligence Assessment Report).

Overall Functioning (Bob Intelligence Assessment Report)

Based on the WASI readings, his average verbal comprehension compared to his peers indicates that he can understand and apply spoken language in class and when interacting with his peers. Additionally, he scored average in perpetual reasoning, indicating that he can apply his senses, especially visual ones, in performing activities like reading and writing (Wright & Raiford, 2021) (Bob Intelligence Assessment Report).

However, Bob’s weaknesses were evident in his visual-spatial skills, indicating that he has challenges comprehending visual processes compared to his peers. The below-average block design score proves that Bob finds it challenging to withstand differential interfaces compared to his peers, especially during exposure to varying visual environments.

Based on the WRAT-4, the average word reading skills indicate Bob’s ability to display similar intellectual performance to his peers. He has an average potential to process texts and derive meanings from them. His sentence comprehension remains average compared to his peers, indicating that he can effectively apply linguistic structures and constraints in understanding and deriving meanings from a string of words (Bob Intelligence Assessment Report).

He also scored average in reading composite compared to his peers, indicating his awareness of English-related concepts, such as phonemics, and his ability to pronounce vocabulary fluently. However, Bob scored below average in spelling and math computation, indicating Bob’s weaknesses in solving basic and calculating mathematics problems compared to his peers. He finds it challenging to follow mathematical procedures in solving basic arithmetic calculations. Besides, Bob’s weaknesses in spelling indicate his inability to encode sounds and correctly write dictations. He has challenges arranging letters in their correct order to form readable and communally understood words (Bob Intelligence Assessment Report).

Recommendations

The readings in the WASI and WRAT-4 indicate that Bob has average overall reasoning. However, he still needs to improve in the areas where he scored below average compared to his peers. For instance, he can improve his visual-spatial skills by playing video games and other activities like chess, which require visualization skills. He should also practice spatial vocabulary, like using comprehensive descriptions when identifying the location of an object (Bob Intelligence Assessment Report).

He should also practice solving puzzles to improve his spatial reasoning. Besides, Treiman (2018) observes that he can improve his spelling skills by regularly reading combinations of vowels and consonants. He can also look for patterns in words to make it easy to remember them. He should also focus on understanding sight words, which are frequently used, such as verbs and adjectives. 

Finally, he can improve on math computation by starting practice with easy calculations and learning the tricks of adding and subtracting huge numbers (Hsu, Chang & Hung, 2018). He can also normalize writing calculations to reduce the energy used in performing them off-head. Consequently, He should also participate in gaming activities like chess to enhance his critical thinking and make decisions regarding math. He should also utilize tutoring resources on the internet to gain essential calculation tricks (Bob Intelligence Assessment Report).

References

Hsu, T. C., Chang, S. C., & Hung, Y. T. (2018). How to learn and how to teach computational thinking: Suggestions based on a review of the literature. Computers & Education, pp. 126, 296–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.07.004

Neukrug, E. & Fawcett, R. C. (2019). Essentials of testing and assessment a practical guide to counselors social workers and psychologists (3rd ed.). Australia: Brooks/Cole.

Treiman, R. (2018). Teaching and learning spelling. Child Development Perspectives, 12(4), 235–239. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12292

Wright, A. J. & Raiford, S. E. (2021). Essentials of psychological tele-assessment. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. https://go.openathens.net/redirector/umoncton.ca?url=https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/umoncton-ebooks/detail.action?docID=6452689.